What is the difference between WCF and other web services ?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/412698/what-is-difference-with-wcf-and-other-web-services
Introduction to Windows Communication Foundation (WCF)
http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/paytonbyrd/introduction-to-windows-communication-foundation-wcf-16539
Looking at the WCF Windows Communication Foundation
http://www.codeguru.com/csharp/csharp/cs_webservices/tutorials/print.php/c13215
WCF 101 – Creating and consuming a basic WCF Service hosted in IIS
http://blogs.msdn.com/tess/archive/2009/01/12/wcf-101-creating-and-consuming-a-basic-wcf-service-hosted-in-iis.aspx
MSDN Webcast: Beyond the Endpoints with Windows Communication Foundation with Juval Lowy
MSDN: Windows Communication Foundation
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms735119.aspx
WCF Contract Design Guidelines
http://blogs.conchango.com/simonevans/archive/2007/04/22/WCF-Contract-Design-Guidelines.aspx
WCF Security Guidelines
http://www.codeplex.com/WCFSecurityGuide/Wiki/View.aspx?title=WCF%20Security%20Guidelines&referringTitle=Home
MSDN Forums: Windows Communication Foundation
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/wcf/threads/
A New Foundation: Taking a Look at WCF
http://www.code-magazine.com/Article.aspx?quickid=060123
WCF Design Pattern: Generic Service
http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/paytonbyrd/wcf-design-pattern-generic-service-19027
Get Familiar With Windows Communication Application Development
http://www.certmag.com/read.php?start=0&in=3529
Implementing a Basic HelloWorld WCF (Windows Communication Foundation) Service
http://www.packtpub.com/article/implementing-basic-wcf-windows-communication-foundation-service
Patterns for Flexible WCF Services
http://www.designpatternsfor.net/default.aspx?pid=99
A comprehensive guide to using MsmqIntegrationBinding with MSMQ 3.0 in WCF
http://blogs.conchango.com/simonevans/archive/2007/09/17/A-comprehensive-guide-to-using-MsmqIntegrationBinding-with-MSMQ-3.0-in-WCF.aspx
WCF Debugging and a WCF review
http://sarafianalex.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/wcf-debuging/
Building a two-way WCF prototype using HTTP based transports
http://drazen.dotlic.name/weblog/archive/2007/04/25/929.aspx
WCF Service Factory Pattern - The Problem
http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/alexexmachina/wcf-service-factory-pattern-the-problem-24857
"...you can't base a WCF service hosted within IIS that uses generics in its operational contract definition because WSDL wants the explicit type definition. This means that instead of a single, clean interface with the generic parameter and a single implementation of that contract, you have to define a strongly typed contract definition and implementation for every business object you plan to support."
(...)
"...Read Programming WCF Services by Juval Lowy, ch. 3, page 120 for more info regarding serialization and generics."
Udi Dahan: WCF Everywhere? Not on my watch.
http://www.udidahan.com/2007/12/29/wcf-everywhere-not-on-my-watch/
Why you should not use the ADO.NET Entity Framework
http://www.kindblad.com/2009/01/11/why-you-should-not-use-the-adonet-entity-framework/
Oracle: Interoperability with Microsoft WCF/.NET
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/webserv_intro/interop.html
WCF 101 – Creating and consuming a basic WCF Service hosted in IIS
http://blogs.msdn.com/tess/archive/2009/01/12/wcf-101-creating-and-consuming-a-basic-wcf-service-hosted-in-iis.aspx
WCF Essentials—Applying the ServiceContract attribute
http://en.csharp-online.net/WCF_Essentials%E2%80%94Applying_the_ServiceContract_attribute
Some WCF Gotchas
http://devpinoy.org/blogs/cruizer/archive/2008/10/05/some-wcf-gotchas.aspx
NHibernate and WCF is Not a Perfect Match
http://weblogs.asp.net/jdanforth/archive/2008/12/22/nhibernate-and-wcf-is-not-a-perfect-match.aspx
http://blogs.conchango.com/simonevans/default.aspx
WF / WCF 4.0
"...I was genuinely surprised by how good WF 4.0 looks. In fact, I'd say it was the best thing I saw at PDC in many ways. This was surprising to me, because I never liked WF 3 or 3.5, because it did not feel finished, and had some fundamental flaws like:
* Poor performance
* Lack of persistence control
* Lack of transaction control
* No correlation support
* Poor threading model for parallel tasks
* Weird XOML based markup
* Not really tied in nicely with WCF (even in 3.5)
* Host problems
So it was great to hear Microsoft say that they agreed! Reading between the lines it is clear that WF4 is a complete rewrite. Microsoft already claim that it is between 10 and 100 times faster than WF 3.5. Persistance control (complete with message box and tracking databases), transactions, correlation and threading have all been addressed and the object model (now under the System.WorkflowModel) now feels very natural to anyone who has used WCF to a point where they feel like the same framework. And for anyone who's used to WPF and Silverlight, you can now model workflows in XAML (including building your own designers - nice). All of this coupled with what was shown (e.g. not much) of Dublin (the new Windows Application Server) make me conclude that hosting issues have also now been addressed...."
Microsoft's Patterns & Practices Application Architecture Guide 2.0
No comments:
Post a Comment