2026-09-28

2026-09-28 Monday - Dismantling the Rogue AI Strawman

 

[image source: DavidGallie on pixabay.com]

Many stories* have emerged in the past year, claiming that rogue AIs have initiated attacks against various systems. A rational examination of the facts is necessary - and one must also take into account these contributing factors:

✅ An LLM/GenAI tool does not possess intelligence, awareness, or consciousness. 

✅ An LLM does not have agency. 

✅ An LLM does not have intent. 

✅ An LLM does not have intrinsic goals.  

✅ There was a prompt that initiated the subsequent behaviors/actions.

✅ The security and network guardrails were reduced/removed.

✅ There was a moronic level of network and cybersecurity incompetence involved – by not conducting the testing in air-gapped secure testing environments.

✅ The LLMs were trained on a vast corpus of books and internet-scraped content - that included sci-fi stories of rogue AIs; what-if cybersecurity scenarios; as well as actual content from various capture-the-flag competitions (which would have included summaries, scripts, code, logs, etc.) – thus, this alleged rogue AI behavior can be easily explained by understanding the next-token stochastic prediction mechanics, with a vast AI token budget to experiment and explore millions/billions of possible paths.


* News Accounts of Rogue AI attacks: 

[any stories that may attribute anthropomorphic intent (malevolent, or otherwise) – is merely an indication of the imbecilic limitations in the writer's understanding of how LLMs function]


 

I submit for your consideration: These are not the result of Rogue AIs – but, in fact, their proximate root cause was simple criminal human negligence (at best). 

 

No comments:

WordCount

Copyright

© 2001-2026 International Technology Ventures, Inc., All Rights Reserved.